🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.