🔗 Share this article

The Life Cycle of a Cult can be defined by distinct phases.

1. The Big Idea

An inspiring figure or coaches introduce an innovative concept offering a panacea for disconnected individuals.

And so it goes. Plans are in motion to challenge the establishment down in Brisbane. Tensions are rising. Conflict emerges from the out-houses. An isolated player, naked, shivering, the slogan POSITIVE INTENT displayed prominently as a symbol, has emerged from the field and is taken aside with discretion towards an inconclusive loan stint at Derbyshire.

Do you recall the beginning, when optimism reigned? The days of Bazball 1.0, of pure instinct.

2. Love-Bombing

Movement founders guarantee a fresh beginning, optimism ahead, love, salvation among a group with shared faith in the method.

How did it feel back then? A team united basking in glory. Body art. Forearms. Jawlines. Elite male wellness energy. Of course, The team insist Bazball doesn’t actually exist, ironically as it’s denied, what was that spectacle?

But we know its essence. It’s Harry Brook executing a stroke so unconventional it defies description. It’s the adrenaline of the leader in ultimate mode, a look that says: focused titan, rugged appearance, untamed style, genuinely raw you wouldn’t be surprised to glance over and see him playing in the field stripped to the waist embracing nature.

It’s the batsman continuing to have permission addressing the media, appearing as a joyful figure smartly dressed, saying stuff like we are actively deconstructing the orange. Certainly, the atmosphere, for quite a long time, was entirely positive.

3. A New Life

Development stage. Unity enforced by rote learning of key phrases. These principles are often illogical as a test of “true belief”.

Does anyone else feel? The reaction, the anger, the feeling of letdown after the first Ashes Test defeat feels overblown, unwarranted. England batted badly on the field, as they often do in Australia. They were dominated in the field for a couple of hours when tactics failed, carved around by Travis Head playing aggressively but smarter, adaptive to conditions, a man playing with brilliance.

Now there is the attacks, the frustration, the view of the sport as a kind of abomination. The consensus is that losing isn’t enough, they should be dismantled, to be scoured, obliterated, defeated via traditional methods of the pace attack, the low-fi orthodoxies of Scott Boland, out there celebrating successes modestly as if receiving a rewarding prize. How will they respond?

4. Hate Bonding

Challenges surface due to setbacks. Yet, mistakes are denied. It starts to feed on hostility externally.

In truth, a few days before from the second Test, we are at an intriguing moment in the story of this approach. England could quite easily win overseas through aggressive play. Probably, they could lose just as quickly. Should they fail it feels like we could be witnessing the final stage.

Before that happens, a couple of points to consider about this. In the past, during the initial excitement, of passion and hope, an piece was published labeling it a movement. There was outrage, which proved the point because everyone knows a method to show lack of cult status is if supporters send hundreds of furiously one-eyed messages rejecting criticism of the philosophy.

Recent events in the last few days are equally notable. Opposition to the style is now the trend. Online outrage is widespread, critical analysts, pictures of upset travelling fans cheated out of three days of cricket, similar to timeshare owners seeking justice.

Conversely, exists the larger scene of the host’s complex more culturally hard-wired exasperation towards the unconventional visitors, claiming, hey, that thing you love and have honed as one way of separating yourself from the opposition, it’s not serious after all.

This is the core issue. All movements are similar. Bazball was a cult because cricket is a cult. In fact, the sport in England is closed, a group, an elite gathering, a restricted environment with two hundred years of tradition and mystery supporting it. This has always been where entry is limited. It’s the British pastime of the British, the early image-makers. And surprisingly, Britain is itself a cult, a series of esoteric hierarchies, a monarchy still exists.

The players have been enclosed within this world from a young age. Attempting to break free, to create a less brutal environment, they are mirroring their own experience, building another enclosure, an exclusive group, but now with 15 cool guys and a leader encouraging individuality provided you conform.

Live where your feet are. Confront risks. Despite efforts, you remain stuck.

With this mind, it might be appropriate to have some sympathy for the approach, to acknowledge its merits, which are significant. What does it represent? Promoting liberation. Defying norms. Batting aggressively|Attacking with